Kalir vs Recorded Future: comparison
Recorded Future is one of the most established global Cyber Threat Intelligence platforms, with enterprise focus. Kalir is a unified EASM + DRP platform with multilingual coverage, accessible pricing and minutes-to-value setup. Both solutions overlap in some use cases but address different buyer profiles.
TL;DR
- Recorded Future: broad global intelligence coverage, enterprise focus, pricing typically from six figures annually.
- Kalir: unified EASM + DRP, multilingual coverage, accessible pricing from free tier, setup in minutes.
- If the use case is global strategic CTI, Recorded Future is usually the more complete option.
- If the use case is operational DRP with accessible pricing and multilingual support need, Kalir is the natural choice.
Quick comparison
| Feature | Kalir | Recorded Future |
|---|---|---|
| Platform and interface language | ES, EN, PT | English (with limited translations) |
| Multilingual source coverage | Native ES, EN, PT and others | Global focus with EN bias |
| EASM + DRP unified | Yes, single platform | CTI primary; EASM and DRP as additional modules |
| Entry pricing | Free tier + accessible paid plans | Typically from six figures USD/year |
| Implementation time | Minutes (self-service) | Weeks to months (managed onboarding) |
| Multilingual support 24/7 | Yes | Limited to EN business hours |
| Multi-tenant for MSSPs | Yes, native | Available in specific plans |
| Human-team takedowns | Included in higher tiers | Available as additional module |
| Learning curve | Low, optimized for mid-market | High, designed for dedicated analysts |
Structural differences
Recorded Future is a Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) platform with modules for brand intelligence, vulnerability intelligence, attack surface and others. Its primary value is the breadth of global coverage and analytical depth for mature intelligence teams.
Kalir is an External Digital Risk Intelligence platform with specific focus on unified EASM + DRP. Unification eliminates the seams that appear when capabilities are bought separately. The platform is built bilingual from day one (ES/EN, with PT on legal layer), not as a translation.
Pricing and licensing model
Recorded Future operates with traditional enterprise licensing: annual contracts typically from six-figure USD, with additional modules adding to the base price. Negotiation is expected and discount depends on annual commitment and modules.
Kalir has a transparent pricing model with a free tier to start (no card) and tiered paid plans by monitored asset volume. Enterprise access exists but is not the only entry door.
Multilingual coverage and languages
Recorded Future covers global sources comprehensively with strong English emphasis. Spanish, Portuguese and other-language sources are covered but are not the primary investment focus.
Kalir invests specifically in multilingual coverage: forums and markets in Spanish, Portuguese and English, Telegram channels in different languages, and a team that can read and understand content in those languages to reduce false positives. This translates into higher relevance of findings for customers with brand or presence in Spanish-speaking or Portuguese-speaking markets.
When to choose Kalir
- The primary use case is operational DRP with short time-to-value expectation.
- You need a multilingual platform (interface, support, reports) for your team.
- You want unified EASM + DRP without paying for separate modules.
- Your organization is mid-market or you want to start self-service without an enterprise process.
- You are an MSSP or consultancy with clients requiring reports in different languages.
When to choose Recorded Future
- Your organization already operates a mature strategic CTI program.
- You need maximum breadth of global intelligence, including state-level APTs and geopolitics.
- You have enterprise budget and a dedicated analyst team to exploit the platform.
- Recorded Future is already an internal standard and integration with your stack is consolidated.
Frequently asked questions
Does Kalir fully replace Recorded Future?
For DRP and operational EASM use cases, yes. For global strategic CTI use cases (APT analysis, geopolitics, deep vulnerability intelligence) Recorded Future remains more complete. Some organizations operate both platforms with complementary purposes.
How much does Recorded Future vs Kalir cost?
Recorded Future does not publish pricing but market reality is annual contracts typically in six-figure USD for full access. Kalir has a free tier and transparent paid plans starting at significantly more accessible price points, scaling by asset volume.
Can I migrate from Recorded Future to Kalir?
Yes, in cases where the actual use is DRP/EASM the migration is straightforward. Kalir assists in the process of exporting rules, asset lists and configurations from the previous platform. Typical functional parity time is 2 to 6 weeks.
Does Recorded Future have better dark web coverage?
In aggregate global English-language volume, yes. In relevance for threats appearing in Spanish-speaking and Portuguese-speaking sources, Kalir typically delivers higher density of actionable findings due to its specific investment in multilingual coverage.