Kalir vs Cyberint: comparison

Cyberint (acquired by Check Point in 2024 and integrated as External Risk Management) is a threat intelligence + DRP + EASM platform now within the Check Point portfolio. Kalir is an independent unified EASM + DRP platform with native multilingual coverage. Both compete in the mid-market to enterprise segment.

Updated:

TL;DR

  • Cyberint: robust platform now part of Check Point, strength in combined CTI + EASM + DRP.
  • Kalir: independent, multilingual platform, accessible pricing from free tier.
  • If your organization already uses the Check Point ecosystem, Cyberint offers tight integration.
  • If you need vendor independence, accessible model and native multilingual coverage, Kalir is the more efficient choice.

Quick comparison

FeatureKalirCyberint
Vendor independenceIndependent platformPart of Check Point ecosystem
Platform languageES, EN, PTEnglish primary
EASM + DRP + CTINative unified EASM + DRPIntegrated EASM + DRP + CTI, integration with Check Point
Multilingual source coverageNative, multi-market focusGlobal coverage with EN/RU/AR focus
Pricing modelFree tier + transparent paidEnterprise, negotiated
Implementation timeMinutes (self-service)Weeks with assisted onboarding
Multilingual supportYes, native 24/7Global support in EN
Multi-tenant for MSSPsNativeAvailable

Product positioning

Cyberint historically positioned as an "Argos Edge" platform combining threat intelligence, attack surface monitoring and digital risk protection. After the Check Point acquisition, it is being integrated into the Infinity ecosystem as External Risk Management module. That is positive if you already operate with Check Point, neutral or negative if you want vendor independence.

Kalir is an independent platform designed specifically for unified EASM + DRP, with multilingual coverage as the main differentiator. It does not depend on a larger security ecosystem.

Coverage and intelligence

Cyberint has a solid reputation in strategic CTI and coverage of global sources in English, Russian and Arabic (reflecting its Israeli origin). Spanish and Portuguese coverage exists but is not a strategic priority.

Kalir invests specifically in multilingual coverage (forums and channels in Spanish, Portuguese, English and others) with human analysis in those languages. For customers with multilingual presence this translates into greater relevance of findings.

Integration with existing stack

Cyberint within Check Point offers tight integration with firewalls, gateways, EDR and other ecosystem capabilities. It is real value if you are already inside Check Point; it is additional lock-in if you are not.

Kalir offers standard integrations (Slack, webhook, email, SIEM/SOAR via API) without assuming any underlying security ecosystem. This makes it easier to combine Kalir with best-of-breed tools without tying you to a vendor.

When to choose Kalir

  • You want to maintain vendor independence (you are not inside Check Point).
  • You need native multilingual coverage as a primary differentiator.
  • You seek a bilingual ES/EN platform for operations in different languages.
  • Your team is mid-market or a multi-market consultancy.
  • You want to start fast without enterprise assisted onboarding.

When to choose Cyberint

  • You already operate within the Check Point Infinity ecosystem and want native integration.
  • You need global strategic CTI combined with DRP on a single platform from the same vendor.
  • Your security program is consolidated enterprise and vendor consolidation is a priority.
  • You have a dedicated team to operate advanced threat intelligence.

Frequently asked questions

Are Kalir and Cyberint comparable in coverage?

In aggregate global coverage in English, Russian and Arabic, Cyberint typically has higher volume due to its installed base and years of operation. In multilingual coverage in Spanish and Portuguese, Kalir typically delivers higher density of actionable findings due to its specific investment.

What happens with Cyberint now that it is inside Check Point?

Cyberint continues operating as a product but is progressively being integrated into the Check Point Infinity portfolio as External Risk Management. The roadmap reflects priorities of the parent vendor, which can be positive (more resources) or negative (changes in pricing and packaging) depending on the case.

Can I migrate from Cyberint to Kalir?

Yes. DRP and EASM flows are comparable and Kalir offers assistance to export configurations, asset lists and rules. Typical functional parity time is 2 to 6 weeks for mid-market cases.

Which has better takedowns?

Cyberint has consolidated track record in global takedowns. Kalir has multilingual coverage with direct relationships with registrars across different jurisdictions, which in many cases results in competitive takedown times.

Try for freeTalk to the team
Activate your protection shieldCreate your free account